Anonymous asked: Supposedly his comment was something about his commitment to jihad. If this is true.. this isn't looking good for him. But then again the media has taken the word Jihad and taken it out of context. He very well could talking about his personal inner struggles in fort devens. On that note aside. I wonder what his sisters are thinking. I mean they little brother they knew could very well be gone.
rotflmao uh no, don’t know who dreamt that up but the only reason it was even brought up in the first place was in response to the defenses latest request for SAMs to be lessened so if people are trying to stir shit up they would do well to explain why Ortiz wouldn’t have jumped on such a comment months ago if it were truly incriminating.
I don’t know if you personally or who ever claims this was the comment is trying to make things sound worse than they are, but its poorly worded and transparent. If after being read the rules and in front of an FBI agent and one of his lawyers Jahar said what you’re talking about he’d have to be incredibly stupid. He’s gone all this time without a blip but now after pleading not guilty and not accepting a plea deal and working with his defense he’d suddenly going to make this damning comment not only in English but right in front of a fed. Seriously? And saying that he’s dedicated to jihad would be considered a lot more than just a “comment to his detriment” but its lovely to see that anons are still making stuff up to try to get people to freak…or is this a poorly veiled fishing expedition?
If/when the comment is finally released or mentioned at the next status conference hearing (as I think O’Toole would need to rule on the defenses latest motion re SAM’s & the prosecutions rebuttal) I think it will make Ortiz look like she’s grasping at straws. For someone who allegedly has such an air tight case, for her to try to make a huge deal out of this Mickey Mouse BS is embarrassing. And while I realize that its the medias job to make a mountain out of a mole hill, they’re getting a little ridiculous with this one. I mean unless they have someone on either legal team feeding them classified info, they have no clue what the comment was either but boy are they having a field day speculating. The more theatrical the better. Must be a slow news day.
I think, because based on the reason for Ortiz not backing up from SAM’s, it was definitely something that she perceives as being information that can be passed on and definitely something that SHE percieves as being of a jihad nature. Now these days, a Muslim who says “F… America” or “911 was an inside job” can be perceived as having jihad sentiments so can you imagine how EVERYTHING that he says can be totally taken out of context. I even made a sarcastic joke about what he could have said and how it can be taken out of context and lo and behold, even that has been taken out of context…so go figure… I agree that the media is really a joke at this point and I really don’t know what is going on with serious news-reporting these days…there is no such thing it seems-serious reporting.
I don’t believe that she truly perceives it to be anything of that nature but if she can twist something to try to make it fit into her already oft used excuse of Jahar looking to inspire others she’s gonna try. You’d hope people would see what a reach it was but with her office specifically not including what the statement was in their motion, it just leads people to assume something much more interesting than reality.
Amen to that!